From time to time, information appears in the press (The Guardian on 05-24-2023) about the deceiving actions carried out by large companies to hide their polluting effects, such as the case of the oil company Chevron.
Chevron is the second largest oil company in the United States and one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world. The company has pledged to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, but has relied heavily on carbon offsets to reach this goal.
New research by Corporate Accountability has found that Chevron's carbon offsets are mostly useless and some may even be harmful. The research, which analyzed Chevron's carbon offset portfolio from 2020 to 2022, found that 93% of offsets were environmentally problematic or had no verifiable impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
Carbon offsets are credits that are purchased to offset greenhouse gas emissions. They can be generated by projects that reduce emissions, such as planting trees or investing in renewable energy. However, the carbon offset market is unregulated and there is no guarantee that offsets will actually offset emissions.
Corporate Accountability's investigation found that Chevron's carbon offset portfolio was full of projects that were environmentally problematic or had no verifiable impact on emissions. For example, Chevron purchased offsets from projects that burned biomass to generate electricity, which can release harmful pollutants into the air. Chevron also bought offsets from projects that planted trees in areas that were already deforested, which doesn't actually reduce emissions.
In addition to being an environmental issue, some of Chevron's carbon offsets can also be detrimental to local communities. For example, Chevron bought offsets for projects that displaced indigenous people from their land. Chevron also purchased offsets for projects that led to the destruction of wildlife habitat.
Chevron has defended its use of carbon offsets, arguing that they are a necessary tool to help the company achieve its net zero emissions goal. However, the findings of the Corporate Accountability investigation suggest that Chevron's carbon offsets are not only worthless, but may also be harmful.
The investigation's findings raise serious questions about Chevron's commitment to climate action. If Chevron is serious about reducing its emissions, it should stop relying on carbon offsets and invest in real solutions like renewable energy and energy efficiency.
Carbon offsets are a controversial topic. Some people believe that they are a valuable tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while others (including myself) believe that in most cases they are a scam.
The problem with carbon offsets is that they are not regulated. There is no guarantee that an offset will actually reduce emissions. In fact, some offsets can even increase emissions.
For example, an offset paid to a farmer for planting trees can increase emissions if the trees are planted in an area that would otherwise be used for grazing. Trees will absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but grasses will no longer be able to absorb carbon dioxide.
Another problem with carbon offsets is that they can be used to greenwash, which is when a company makes false or misleading claims about its environmental practices. For example, a company might claim that it is reducing its emissions by purchasing carbon offsets, when in reality the offsets have no real impact.
The future of carbon offsets is uncertain and I think they should be stopped. The carbon offset market is unregulated and there is no guarantee that offsets will actually reduce emissions. In addition, carbon offsets are generally used to "Green-wash" the company in question.
The European Union is also developing a carbon offset market. The EU market would require offsets to be verified and have a real impact on emissions. But the results remain to be seen.
In the meantime, we will have to fight to counteract the "Green-washing" actions of companies that they will try to deceive us as much as they can.
EN 
ES_ES 