The concept of the 15-minute city, developed by French urban planner Carlos Moreno, has become a topic of debate in recent years. This concept proposes that cities should be designed so that people can access everything they need on foot, by bike or by public transport within a 15-minute radius.
The advantages of 15-minute cities are numerous. On the one hand, this urban model promotes the health and well-being of citizens, as it encourages physical activity and reduces air pollution. On the other hand, 15-minute cities are more sustainable, since they reduce the need for motorized transport.
However, the concept of the 15-minute city has also been the subject of criticism and conspiracy theories. Some opponents of this urban model claim that it is a plan to control the population and limit their freedom of movement. Others maintain that 15-minute cities are an unviable utopia that cannot be applied in practice.
The arguments of conspiracy theories about 15-minute cities are based on a series of assumptions. First, conspiracy theorists claim that 15-minute cities are a plan to limit people's freedom of movement. According to this argument, 15-minute cities would prevent people from traveling to other places, making them more dependent on the authorities.
Second, conspiracy theorists argue that 15-minute cities are a form of social control. According to this argument, 15-minute cities would be easier for authorities to control, since people would be more concentrated in a small area.
Third, conspiracy theorists claim that 15-minute cities are an unviable utopia. According to this argument, 15-minute cities cannot be applied in practice, as they would require profound changes in the way cities are built and planned.
Defenders of 15-minute cities refute the arguments of conspiracy theories. First, they argue that 15-minute cities do not limit freedom of movement, but rather encourage it. According to this argument, 15-minute cities make it easier for people to get around on foot, by bike or by public transport, giving them more mobility options.
Second, advocates of 15-minute cities argue that these cities are not a form of social control, but rather a way to promote citizen participation. According to this argument, 15-minute cities make it easier for people to connect with their community and participate in public life.
Third, advocates of 15-minute cities argue that 15-minute cities are a viable model that can be applied in practice. According to this argument, 15-minute cities are already being implemented in some cities around the world, with positive results.
I think that we should not be so innocent and that things do not happen by chance. Opposition to this idea generally comes from retrograde environments of the extreme political right, many of whom also deny the Climate Crisis.
And in general these people have a lot of power and a lot of money to access social networks to transmit their lies, in order to confuse well-intentioned but poorly informed people.
It is something that must be fought against.
EN 
ES_ES 