In the never-ending battle against climate change, any advance, no matter how small, is a breath of fresh air. While the absolute priority remains the drastic reduction of CO2 emissions, the reality is that we have already released a huge amount into the atmosphere, and unfortunately, we continue to do so. Therefore, research into methods of capturing and removing CO2 has become a crucial field. Absorption by trees, oceans, and now… covalent organic frameworks?
Recently, a study published in the prestigious journal Nature by researchers at the University of Berkeley has caught my attention. They describe a new material, the so-called covalent organic frameworks (COFs), with an astonishing capacity to absorb CO2 from the air. According to their findings, just 200 grams of this material could capture up to 20 kilos of carbon per year, equivalent to what a tree absorbs!
This news is certainly shocking. Coming from the scientific rigor of a publication in Nature, I assume its veracity, because I believe that a researcher would not risk his reputation by publishing results without a solid experimental basis. In addition, the study goes further: one of the researchers suggests that, by optimizing the size of the pores of the material, its absorption capacity could be doubled. Imagine the potential!
The idea of a material capable of “sucking up” CO2 from the air, like a kind of molecular sponge, is fascinating. It opens up a range of possibilities to mitigate the impact of climate change. We could imagine, in the future, large-scale air filtering systems, incorporating this material in buildings, infrastructure, and even vehicles.
However, and here comes the dose of realism that I always try to provide, technology alone will not save us. We must be cautious and avoid falling into the trap of the “magic technological solution.” Although this advance is promising, we cannot allow it to distract us from the real priority: stopping pollution.
The fight against climate change is a race against time, and every gram of CO2 we avoid emitting is a small victory. We need a radical transformation in our way of life, in our production and consumption systems. We must make a rapid transition to a low-carbon economy, promoting renewable energy, energy efficiency and sustainable mobility.
The problem with technological advances such as this one of COFs is that they can sometimes create a false sense of security, a kind of “we'll sort it out later”. We run the risk of postponing the urgent actions we need to implement right now, trusting that technology will rescue us in the future.
Another crucial aspect to consider is the cost. Although the study does not delve into this point, it is logical to assume that large-scale production of this new material will entail a significant investment. Will it be economically viable? Who will bear the costs? These are questions we must ask ourselves from the beginning, but they are not the most important.
We cannot forget the injustice inherent in the climate crisis. While developed countries, the main culprits of historical emissions, invest in research and development of new technologies, it is the most vulnerable populations in developing countries that suffer the most devastating consequences of global warming. Droughts, floods, forced displacement... the bill is paid by those who have contributed the least to the problem.
This new material, COFs, represents a ray of hope in the fight against climate change. But hope is not enough. We need action. We need a global, real and effective commitment to reduce emissions, urgently change towards a sustainable model and support the most affected communities.
Citizen awareness is essential. We must demand that our governments and companies assume their responsibility. We must inform ourselves, educate ourselves and actively participate in the search for solutions. The future of the planet, and of future generations, is at stake. We cannot afford indifference. Life, as we say, is sometimes unfair, but we cannot allow inaction to further aggravate this injustice.
And the question that always arises in these cases is: Will we do it?
EN 
ES