In the media circus surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI), one statement resonates with particular force in various forums: AI can solve the climate crisis. This idea, repeated enthusiastically by some, especially by those who sell the benefits of this technology, is a dangerous mirage. While AI can be a useful tool, presenting it as the magic solution to our environmental problems is, at the very least, naive and, at worst, a smokescreen to hide real inaction.
Recently, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, joined this narrative by promising a wave of prosperity driven by AI, including the solution to climate change. Although I understand the desire to sell their product, it is worrying that this discourse is replicated without the critical counterpoint it deserves. The press and society in general should not fall into the trap of simplification. The climate crisis is a complex and multifaceted challenge, and reducing it to a problem that AI can solve with an algorithm is a fallacy.
While it is true that AI can provide valuable tools to analyze climate data, optimize energy efficiency or develop renewable energy, let us not forget that the root of the problem lies in our production and consumption model. The obsession with unlimited economic growth, the dependence on fossil fuels and the lack of political will to implement structural changes are the real obstacles to overcome.
It is paradoxical that, while the potential of AI to save the planet is being praised, the same companies that develop it – Microsoft, Google, etc. – announce a considerable increase in their energy consumption. AI's voracity for electricity is a fact, so much so that some are already looking to nuclear energy as an alternative to power their data centers. Isn't it contradictory that the climate panacea is fueling the crisis it claims to solve?
Meanwhile, we continue to subsidize fossil fuels, incentivize polluting transportation, and postpone difficult decisions that involve a real change in our lifestyle. Political leaders, with an eye on the upcoming elections, avoid unpopular measures that, although necessary to stop the climate crisis, could affect their electoral base.
It is undeniable that the increase in solar and wind energy generation is a positive step forward. However, the reality is that these advances are insufficient if they are not accompanied by a profound transformation of our economic and social model. AI can be a useful instrument in this transition, but it cannot replace political will, individual responsibility, and social justice, essential elements for building a sustainable future.
In short, let us not be fooled by technological siren songs. AI will not magically solve the climate crisis. The solution lies in our ability to rethink our place in the world, to adopt a sustainable development model, and to demand courageous and decisive action from our leaders. Technology can be an ally, but true transformation depends on us.
EN 
ES