In the frenzy for sustainability, investment in "green" funds has skyrocketed. People are looking for investment opportunities aligned with their values, and the promise of a green future seems irresistible. However, an analysis by The Guardian and other media outlets reveals a worrying reality: many of these funds are using "greenwashing" to hide their investments in projects that actually fund the fossil fuel industries.
The image of sustainability that some investment funds project crumbles when the reality of their investments becomes apparent. One example, like the one that recently was brought out to the public, shows how funds promoted as "sustainable" massively finance projects of the largest oil companies, reaching amounts exceeding $33 trillion. How is it possible for this to happen and for people to believe it?
The problem goes beyond a simple lack of transparency. In many cases, the managers of these funds act with astonishing irresponsibility. They blatantly lie to investors who trust them to invest in "sustainable projects" that, in practice, are not. And, even more seriously, there are no consequences. No sanctions, no fines, not even a simple slap on the wrist for those involved.
Investigative journalism, and in this case that of The Guardian newspaper, has played a crucial role in exposing these practices. We come across stories like that of the Sustainable Global Stars fund, which was criticized for its actions. The fund manager's response was simply to remove the word "sustainable" from the fund's name. Is this the way a problem of this magnitude should be addressed? Where does that leave investors' credibility?
This situation leads us to a fundamental question: Why don't our monetary authorities act more decisively in the face of these abuses? Don't they have an obligation to monitor and control the investments of funds, especially those that call themselves "sustainable"? Their inaction, or apparent passivity, contributes to the feeling of tacit collusion that allows these deceptive practices.
My own experience, albeit modest, leads me to acknowledge this concern. With a very small stake in a fund of this type, I find myself needing to request information about its investments, even though I understand that I probably won't receive the transparency I desire. The fear of being deceived is palpable.
The investigative work carried out by investigative journalists like The Guardian is crucial. It is a beacon of light amidst a darkness that threatens to obscure the true consequences of some investments in the name of sustainability. It should be monetary authorities, not the media, that carry out this oversight. Their work should focus on preventing citizens from falling victim to these schemes by establishing strict regulations and monitoring compliance.
What does this picture tell us? It reveals a clear lack of regulatory oversight in the field of sustainable investment. At the same time, it exposes the lack of accountability of some fund managers. Without an efficient oversight mechanism and exemplary sanctions for the entities involved, the future of sustainable investment looks bleak.
This is not just a financial issue. It's a question of values, of trust in the system, and of protecting the planet. We demand transparency, accountability, and decisive action from the authorities to prevent the continued use of sustainability as a facade to hide practices that ultimately harm the environment and investors.
Those responsible must be held accountable, and investigative journalism must continue to do its work to keep the pressure on them. The task now is twofold: the authorities must act, and investors must demand truthful information.
I once again congratulate the investigative work carried out.
EN 
ES