I recently came across a piece of news that left me, to say the least, perplexed: Lonestar Data Holdings, a company specializing in high-security data centers, plans to install them… on the Moon! Yes, you read that right, our natural satellite could become the home of our data. The justification, according to the company, is based on the greater security that the Moon offers against wars, earthquakes and other terrestrial disasters.
In addition, they argue that the low lunar temperatures would eliminate the need for expensive cooling systems, and that electrical circuits would operate more efficiently. At first glance, it seems like a paradise for data storage: a safe, stable and energy-efficient environment. However, is it really as brilliant an idea as it seems?
The idea of a lunar data center, although it seems straight out of a science fiction movie, is not at all far-fetched from a technical point of view. In fact, the technology needed to carry out such a project is, to a large extent, available. The real problem lies not in the “how,” but in the “why.” Do the supposed advantages really justify the enormous challenges involved in an undertaking of this magnitude?
The cost of transporting the equipment and building the infrastructure on the Moon would be astronomical (forgive the redundancy). Imagine the logistics required to send construction materials, servers, power systems and everything else needed to keep a data center operational 384,400 kilometers away. And let's not even talk about repairs. A simple technical failure that on Earth would be solved in hours could become a logistical and economic nightmare on the Moon.
Another major obstacle is latency. The distance between the Earth and the Moon implies a delay of approximately 1.4 seconds in data transmission. While this may be acceptable for certain applications that do not need to operate online, for many others, such as real-time financial transactions, online video games or videoconferencing, this latency would be intolerable.
Lonestar Data Holdings argues that security is the main advantage of a lunar data center. However, is the Moon really safer than Earth in this regard? While it is true that the Moon is free of wars (for now) and earthquakes, it presents other risks, such as solar radiation that they claim to have controlled and micrometeorite impacts, which could damage equipment. In addition, a lunar data center would be a tempting target for hackers or even governments with interests in the information stored there.
A video of the company can be seen at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b94pzvN574E#ddg-play
On Earth, there are numerous geographically isolated and politically stable locations that offer a high degree of security for data centers, without the risks and costs associated with the Moon. We can find places with low seismic risk, cold climates that minimize the need for cooling, and access to renewable energy sources. There are even underwater data centers that take advantage of water temperatures for cooling.
Just because something is technically possible doesn't mean it's practical or sensible. In the case of lunar data centers, the balance clearly tips towards the side of pragmatism. Investing in robust and secure terrestrial infrastructure, taking advantage of the advantages offered by our own planet, seems a much more logical and efficient option.
Perhaps in the distant future, when lunar colonization is a reality and latency has been significantly reduced, the idea of a data center on the Moon will make more sense. But for now, I fear that it is more of a marketing strategy than a practical solution to the challenges of data storage.
Pragmatism must prevail over the fascination with novelty. After all, on Earth we have plenty of fertile "grounds" to cultivate the security of our data, without needing to look to the stars.
EN 
ES