The idea of limiting the useful life of vehicles as a measure to reduce polluting emissions has gained ground in recent years. The underlying logic is simple: older vehicles tend to be less fuel efficient and emit more greenhouse gases.
However, the reality is much more complex, and simply imposing an age limit on vehicles does not guarantee a significant reduction in emissions. In fact, it could even have unforeseen negative consequences.
It is true that emissions are reduced, but at a cost. It is true that newer vehicles tend to be more fuel efficient and generate fewer emissions, but simply imposing an age limit on vehicles comes with a number of factors that can undermine the expected benefits.
One of the main drawbacks is that the production of new vehicles generates significant emissions during the manufacturing process. The extraction of raw materials, the production of components, assembly and transportation to the point of sale generate a considerable carbon footprint.
Therefore, although the disposal of old vehicles reduces emissions related to fuel use, these are largely offset by the emissions generated during the production of new vehicles to replace them. This balance between manufacturing emissions and vehicle life cycle emissions is a crucial factor to consider when analyzing the total environmental impact.
The debate over vehicle age limits is not just limited to greenhouse gas emissions. The production of new vehicles also demands a significant amount of natural resources, mainly metals such as aluminum and steel.
Studies have shown that implementing age limits for vehicles could increase demand for these metals by a range of 2% to 7%. This, in turn, would have a negative impact on ecosystems, generating more pressure on mines and increasing pollution derived from the extraction and processing of these resources.
The solution is very complex, and decisions should not be made lightly, something that politicians seem to be experts at. Reducing vehicle emissions requires a comprehensive approach that considers all aspects of the life cycle, from production to end-of-life.
It is essential to promote policies that encourage the production of more efficient and sustainable vehicles, including incentives for the purchase of electric or hybrid vehicles, as well as the development of more sustainable battery technologies with a longer life cycle.
In short, limiting the useful life of vehicles is not the magical solution to reduce polluting emissions. The complexity of the situation requires a more strategic approach that takes into account the emissions from the production of new vehicles, the impact on the use of natural resources and the promotion of circular economy practices.
You can see an article about it at:
“Are vehicle lifespan caps an effective and efficient method for reducing US light-duty vehicle fleet GHG emissions?Published in Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability 2024.
And this is the link to see it: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4505/ad397e/pdf
EN 
ES