The rise of artificial intelligence and the unstoppable growth of the cloud have created an energy-hungry beast: data centers. These server farms, which support our digital lives, consume huge amounts of electricity, posing an increasingly pressing environmental dilemma. Against this backdrop, nuclear energy is re-emerging as a viable and, at the same time, controversial alternative.
Until recently, nuclear energy seemed destined for an uncertain future. The ghost of Chernobyl and Fukushima, the complexity of waste management and competition from renewable energies relegated it to the background. However, growing energy demand and the urgency of the climate crisis have driven a change of perspective.
Artificial Intelligence, in particular, is emerging as a determining factor in this paradigm shift. Training AI algorithms requires unprecedented computing power, which translates into colossal energy consumption.
Data centers need a constant and reliable power supply, something that nuclear power can guarantee. Unlike renewable energy, subject to the intermittency of the sun or wind, nuclear power plants provide a constant flow of energy, without depending on weather conditions.
Esta compatibilidad ha llamado la atención de gigantes tecnológicos como Google y Microsoft, quienes se han comprometido a alcanzar la neutralidad de carbono en sus operaciones. Estas empresas ya están invirtiendo en acuerdos con proveedores de energía nuclear para alimentar sus centros de datos con energía «limpia».
In the United States, the Biden administration has shown its support for nuclear energy as a tool to combat climate change. Funds are being allocated to avoid the closure of existing nuclear power plants and to promote the development of small modular reactors (SMR), a safer and more flexible technology that is expected to be available early in the next decade.
Despite its advantages, nuclear energy is not without controversy. Managing radioactive waste remains a complex technical and environmental challenge. While methods exist for its safe long-term storage, public perception remains a serious obstacle.
Another factor to consider is the risk, albeit low, of nuclear accidents. The events at Fukushima in 2011 demonstrated that, despite advances in safety, nuclear power is not free of potential dangers.
In addition, building new nuclear power plants is a costly and slow process, which could make their large-scale implementation difficult in the short term.
La relación entre los centros de datos y la energía nuclear es, sin duda, un matrimonio por conveniencia. Ambas partes se necesitan mutuamente: los centros de datos, para satisfacer su voraz apetito energético de forma «limpia», y la energía nuclear, para encontrar un nuevo propósito en un mundo cada vez más electrificado.
However, doubts remain about the long-term viability of this relationship. The evolution of renewable energy, energy efficiency and the development of new energy storage technologies could change the landscape in the coming decades.
Ultimately, the decision to go with nuclear power to power data centers is not a simple one. It involves weighing short-term environmental benefits against long-term challenges. It is a complex debate that requires thorough analysis and responsible decision-making, considering all the factors at play.
What is clear is that the future of energy will be a diverse mosaic, where nuclear power could play a relevant role, although not without controversy.
As I often suggest, time will tell.
EN 
ES