Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer just a promise of the future; it is the present, setting the course of the global economy, politics, and society. And although many countries are investing in its development, the real race is between two giants: the United States and China.
Two opposing visions. Two completely different strategies. And a single technology capable of transforming the world as we know it.
From Silicon Valley to Washington, the message is clear: lead or be left behind. The United States, with its major technology companies such as OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and NVIDIA, has a significant lead in both the development of language models and the manufacturing of specialized AI hardware.
Under the leadership of figures like Donald Trump, the American commitment is not only to innovation, but also to total control of the global market. A strategy that combines massive investment, geopolitical pressure, and the classic "carrot and stick" policy: aid and access to technology for those who align with their interests, sanctions and restrictions for those who don't.
Trump and many of the CEOs of the big tech companies don't seem interested in global AI governance. On the contrary, they benefit from AI without strict regulation, where its power can grow without limits.
Although it lags somewhat behind in some key aspects, China isn't sitting idly by. The country has invested billions in AI, with an ecosystem that combines universities, state-owned enterprises, and tech giants like Baidu, Alibaba, and Huawei.
What's most interesting, however, isn't just its technological capabilities, but its political and strategic proposal. China has begun to promote the idea of creating an international organization for AI governance, similar to what the UN once did for politics or the WTO for trade.
The goal would be to prevent this highly disruptive technology from becoming a "runaway horse," dominated by a few and without democratic oversight.
In this context, Europe is watching with growing concern, caught between the two models. European institutions, along with many technological and academic leaders, seem closer to the Chinese vision: an international system of control, transparency, and accountability for AI.
The recent European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a step in that direction: setting limits, classifying risks, and protecting citizens. But without its own technological leadership comparable to that of the US or China, the continent remains more of a regulator than a protagonist.
Artificial intelligence will undoubtedly be one of the pillars of global power in the coming decades. What is at stake is not only who develops the most powerful models, but who sets the rules of the game.
A future where a few companies control AI without external oversight? Or a more balanced scenario, with clear rules and international cooperation?
Everything indicates that we will experience years of intense tension between these two visions: that of unilateral dominance and that of shared governance. And as citizens, users, and professionals, we cannot remain on the sidelines.
AI is not just about algorithms and chips. It's a question of power, ethics, and responsibility. The United States is committed to leading without constraints. China proposes governing jointly. And the rest of the world, especially Europe, will have to decide which side it wants to be on.
The race has already begun. And its outcome will define our future.
EN 
ES