The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to an unprecedented boom in demand for cloud services. Companies like META, Google, and Microsoft, the giants that dominate this market, are building and expanding their colossal data centers at a dizzying pace. This growth, however, brings with it a considerable increase in energy consumption and, consequently, in their carbon footprint. Sustainability goals, once so ambitious, are now threatened by AI's voracious thirst for energy.
What's the solution? For many of these companies, which have committed to carbon neutrality goals by 2030, the answer has begun to turn to an unusual scenario: nuclear energy.
Recently, the news resonated in the specialized media: META has reached a confidential agreement with a nuclear plant in Illinois (Clinton Clean Energy Center) to keep it operational for a period of 10 to 20 years. The plant, which was on the verge of closure, will now be a key partner to power META's servers, guaranteeing a reliable and stable energy supply for an extended period.
This agreement, far from being an anecdote, reflects a significant change in the energy strategy of large technology companies. The need to reduce their environmental impact, at a time when data centers consume huge amounts of energy, has forced these companies to explore alternatives, including a traditional energy source that, until recently, had been considered obsolete.
And it's not just META. It is suspected, and information is leaking on specialized forums, that Google and Microsoft are following a similar path. The pressure to meet their environmental commitments, increasingly difficult to achieve with the increase in energy consumption due to AI, has led them to seek solutions outside the conventional renewable paradigm.
The case of META in Illinois is particularly relevant. The Clinton Clean Energy Center, which generates nuclear energy, will provide a stable source of electricity with a very low greenhouse gas emission potential compared to more common energy sources, such as fossil fuel-based thermal power or intermittent renewable energy generation.
This strategy, although not without controversy, poses a fascinating dilemma. Nuclear energy, despite concerns about its safety and waste storage, offers a short-term solution to an imminent energy problem. Technology companies, with their vast financial resources, can afford to finance and support these strategies, helping to maintain the viability of infrastructure that would otherwise become obsolete.
However, the decision to turn to nuclear energy to power data centers raises questions about long-term sustainability. Is this a definitive solution or a short-term strategy, a temporary measure until significant advances in renewable energy are achieved? It's a question many experts are asking, and one that the companies themselves probably don't answer openly.
The commitment to nuclear energy by these large corporations is nothing short of a turning point. It's a clear indicator of the complexity of the transition to a sustainable economy. The race for carbon neutrality has become a much more complex challenge than many thought, and technology companies, in their eagerness to maintain leadership in the AI and cloud services sector, are exploring unconventional options to meet their goals, even if some of those goals are unrealistic.
The question is: how far will they be willing to go?
EN 
ES