More than a decade ago, BP (British Petroleum) made a decision that, at the time, seemed visionary: to diversify its investments and allocate part of its capital to renewable energies. With growing global concern about climate change and the transition to a decarbonized economy, BP's strategy sought to prepare the company for a future in which fossil fuels would lose prominence. However, the financial results have not been as expected, and the oil giant has decided to take a step back and refocus on oil and gas.
The fundamental problem of the energy transition at BP is not technological or even operational, but financial. While BP was betting on renewables, other large oil companies, such as Shell and ExxonMobil, maintained a more conservative approach, prioritizing fossil fuels and generating greater profits in the short term.
Investors, who are mostly looking for immediate returns, have been unhappy that BP has lost value on the stock market and has offered lower returns than its competitors. In an environment where financial markets reward immediate profitability over long-term sustainability, the pressure has been unsustainable.
The situation is aggravated if we consider that BP, although it is a British company, barely has 10% of its business in the United Kingdom. A large part of its shareholders are American, and in the current political context, with figures such as Donald Trump promoting the slogan "drill baby drill", interest in renewable energy has taken a backseat. For many of these investors, climate change is an irrelevant issue, or worse still, a threat to their immediate profits.
BP's strategy shift has been: More Oil and Gas, More Profits
Faced with pressure from shareholders, BP's management has opted for a pragmatic strategy: reducing its investments in renewables and focusing on oil and gas extraction. This shift not only seeks to maximize short-term profits, but also to maintain high dividends for shareholders and improve its position in the financial markets.
The underlying problem is that this decision, although understandable from a financial point of view, delays the global energy transition. BP is not alone in this move: many major oil companies are pursuing similar strategies, taking advantage of the persistent demand for fossil fuels and political support in key countries such as the United States.
The major oil companies not only benefit from the market, but also have immense power to influence politics. Their ability to lobby at all institutional levels allows them to block or slow down any measure that could affect their profits.
Every time a Climate Summit is held, the difficulty of reaching ambitious and binding agreements becomes evident. Countries that are most dependent on fossil fuels, along with pressure from powerful business groups, are finding ways to water down environmental commitments and delay the actions needed to curb climate change.
While BP and other companies prioritize the short term, the real cost of these decisions will fall on future generations. The climate crisis is already showing its effects with extreme weather events, rising sea levels and loss of biodiversity. But for big investors, these problems are not immediate, and their descendants will have the financial resources to mitigate its effects.
The transition to renewable energy is inevitable, but the pace at which it occurs is crucial. Every delay means more emissions, more global warming and greater consequences for millions of people around the world. Meanwhile, big capital continues to prioritize its profits, regardless of the price we will pay as a society.
As a final reflection, we see that the BP case is a clear example of why the energy transition is taking so long to materialize. The pressure for immediate profit, the influence of the big oil groups and the lack of political will have turned the fight against climate change into a race against time.
If we want a sustainable future, we need structural changes in how financial markets work and how energy decisions are made. Without stricter regulation, real commitment from governments and greater social awareness, we will continue to see how big oil companies prioritize their profits over the well-being of the planet.
Meanwhile, BP's message is clear: the future can wait, profits cannot. And we, as a society, continue to pay the price.
This is how unfair life is !!
EN 
ES