Views: 0
Artificial intelligence has just taken another step into our daily lives. Meta, the company led by Mark Zuckerberg, has unveiled Muse, a personal AI agent designed to do far more than just answer questions: it can act on our behalf.
The concept is simple yet vast. We can ask it to manage tasks, look up information, send emails, book trips, fill out forms, or even make purchases. Muse can operate autonomously and continue working on specific tasks even after we close the application.
To achieve this, it needs to know its user intimately. It must understand their preferences, goals, schedule, and the apps they use. In short, the more it knows about us, the more useful it can become.
And this brings us to the major issue: privacy. Meta asserts that Muse was designed from the ground up with robust security measures. It runs on a dedicated virtual machine—called Muse Secure VM—that keeps user data and credentials isolated. Furthermore, certain sensitive actions, such as sending emails or making purchases, require authorization.
There is even an interesting feature: Meta claims Muse cannot directly view our passwords or certain payment details, although it can utilize them through secure systems. The company has also announced a "Confidential VM" mode, slated for late 2026, in which encryption keys will remain solely in the user's hands.
Yet, the technology raises a much deeper question: How much are we willing to entrust to an AI agent in exchange for making our lives easier?
After all, a truly personal assistant needs to know the details of our lives—our emails, appointments, purchases, travel, contacts, preferences, and decisions. And if we eventually want it to manage financial matters as well, the sensitivity of that information increases even further.
It is not merely a question of whether Muse is secure today. It is about trusting that it will remain secure tomorrow, and knowing what might happen if conditions, the company, its policies, or even the laws change.
Major tech companies are competing precisely to become our permanent digital assistant. Meta is already openly discussing a future "personal superintelligence" capable of working continuously for each user.
Will there be millions of people willing to grant an AI that level of access? It is certainly possible. Personally, I am quite clear on this: I prefer to remain in control of my life, my data, and my money. Convenience is important, but my autonomy and privacy matter far more.
Have a nice day
NOTE:
I inform you that this Blog is also posted on Spotify as a Podcast, which I publish on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.
You can listen to it in Spanish—"Desde la terraza de Amador"—at the following link.
Or in English, "From Amador’s Terrace," at the following link.
EN 
ES