The other day I was reading an article that left me with a bitter aftertaste, a mixture of indignation and frustration. The theme, a recurring one: the abysmal disconnect between the climate emergency that threatens us and the excessive lifestyle of a privileged minority. Specifically, the article focused on the indiscriminate use of private jets by the ultra-rich, who seem to use them with the same carelessness with which one calls a taxi.
And while part of the world debates how to reduce its carbon footprint, they fly through the skies in their luxury capsules, burning fuel and contributing disproportionately to global warming. Does it sound like a dystopia? Well, it is our reality.
The figure that struck me the most, and that sums up the obscenity of the situation, is this: a private jet pollutes in one hour what the average person does in a year. Let that sink in for a moment. While many of us strive to recycle, use public transport or reduce our meat consumption, a privileged elite burns in a whim what would cost us a whole year of emissions.
And let's be honest, most of these flights are not for urgent business reasons or imperative needs. They are weekend flights, getaways to sporting events, shopping in distant cities, whims, in short. A waste of fossil fuel to satisfy the desires of a few, while part of the planet literally burns.
Communications Earth & Environment magazine has published these alarming figures. Carbon dioxide emissions from private jets increased by 46% between 2019 and 2023. In 2023 alone, these planes generated 15.6 million tons of CO2, the equivalent of the annual emissions of 3.7 million cars. And the most shocking thing: almost half of these flights (47%) traveled less than 500 km. Distances that, in many cases, could easily be covered by train or even by car, with an infinitely smaller environmental impact.
And what consequences does this private air party have for the planet? Well, in addition to directly contributing to global warming and the extreme weather events that are becoming more frequent, it perpetuates a flagrant climate injustice. While the most vulnerable suffer the consequences of climate change (droughts, floods, forced displacement), those responsible for a disproportionate share of emissions continue to live in their luxury bubble, oblivious to reality. And, at the height of cynicism, when things get really bad, they will have the resources to move to less affected areas, leaving the rest to the fate that awaits for them.
This behaviour is not only irresponsible, it is immoral. While most of us are asked (and rightly so) to make sacrifices to reduce our carbon footprint, a privileged minority continue to act as if the laws of physics and the consequences of climate change do not concern them. It is as if they were on a luxury yacht, enjoying champagne while the Titanic sinks, trusting that their private lifeboat will keep them afloat.
What can we do about this situation? We cannot sit back, hoping that the good will of the ultra-rich will solve the problem. We need stricter regulations that limit the use of private jets, that heavily tax the emissions of these luxury flights and that promote more sustainable transport alternatives. We also need greater social awareness of the environmental impact of such practices and citizen pressure to demand real change.
The climate crisis is a collective problem that requires collective solutions. We cannot allow a privileged minority to continue acting with impunity, mortgaging the future of the planet to satisfy their whims. It is time to wake up from our lethargy and demand change. The planet, and future generations, demand it from us.
The real PROBLEM is: Do you think anything will be done? Allow me to doubt it.
EN 
ES